My Foreword.
Firstly I would like to point out that I am not trying to discourage the human race from carrying out its responsibilities in looking after our planet.
I am merely trying to point out how easy it is for scientific data to be misread, and for the majority of scientists to follow the resulting findings. This maybe because they have no other plausible answer for the data produced or even that they are worried about losing their reputations by opposing the resulting (Greenhouse theory). Sadly this is with enormous cost to us all.
During 1999 while studying plate tectonics and magnetic anomalies upon earth’s oceanic lithosphere I noticed that a relationship existed between the north magnetic pole’s path and its velocity related to climate change. So I turned more of my attention to this subject and it soon became evident to me that 1.The extent to which the north magnet pole had moved and 2. Its time scale in conjunction with our weather patterns, so I decided to search even more of the related fields of study.
Although earth is not warming at the previously estimated rates, it is obvious we are experiencing all around our planet a definite period of change in our climate. This next graphic shows an ice core extracted from from one of earths polar ice caps, the gas bubbles within this ice produced the data needed to compile the 400,000 year + records for Co2 and temperature.
The 400,000-year ice core records for temperature and Co2 are the very basis for the greenhouse gas theory and indicate that present temperatures are very slightly higher than those spanning a much greater period.
Personally I wondered what may have caused these previous regular peaks, as the time scale involved shows they could not have been caused by human intervention. It soon became evident to me that the peaks on this chart are moving further apart with time, roughly 7% every 100,000 yrs, and by doing so this indicates a process or reaction that is gradually slowing down.
It is understandable when looking at the Similarities between the graphs below that scientists could believe one of the processes was the cause of the other. These results could be the very reason that scientists were mislead into believing Co2 was the cause of climate change.
Fig(1)
The above graphic shows a superimposed chart from sea ice & air data collected primarily from the GISP2 and Vostok fields and retained by NASA.
In short: someone assumed that because of the similarities in the above charts one had to be the cause the other. When in actual fact they could both have been caused by a third force or process.
The following work is borne from exactly the same data scientists used when theorising the Greenhouse Gas theory.
Quietly Beneath Our Feet
An Engine for Climate Change
By Roy Masters.
England.
Few people realize that earth’s north magnetic pole has moved some 2,000-Km or more over the past 400 years. But it has gained a tremendous amount of velocity over the last 100 years.
Periods when the pole was moving very slowly or even stopped Scientists called Geomagnetic Jerks. A good example of a Geomagnetic Jerk is between.1831 and 1904 when the geomagnetic pole moved just 70 km. And during that period the north magnetic pole slowed, stopped, then changed direction. More importantly during that period the winters were extremely cold and the river Thames was frozen for seven years consecutively allowing ice fairs to be held on it. Throughout this period the Northern hemisphere was experiencing extremely harsh winters. It appeared to me that at times when the poles were moving very slowly or were stationary, as with magnetic jerks or at times when the pole changed direction, earth’s winter temperatures would not only plummet but its seasons would become much more defined.
In 1947, two Canadian scientists paid a visit to the magnetic pole, they found it near Allen Lake on Prince of Wales Island in Northern Canada showing the pole had gained velocity and moved some 250km northwest since those early observations. Then during the early 1950s there was another small magnetic jerk, the river Thames was again partially frozen and for several years people were skating on it at Richmond.
After that period the magnetic pole was visited regularly in order to determine its position. In 1972 scientists working alongside NASA recorded the movement of the pole as having a velocity of just 9 km a year. Then in April and May of 1994, just 22years later, when Larry Newitt of the geological survey of Canada and Charles Barton of the Australian Geological Survey Organization visited the pole, they found its yearly velocity had increased and was now 15 km a year.
Seven years later in 2001 Larry’s team discovered its velocity had increased to an incredible 40 km a year, they also calculated its potential position in 2005. Larry was unable to get direct measurements in 2005 as bad weather prevented the team from reaching the pole but he did manage to get close enough to take two measurements.
He told me it appears as though the pole is further away than expected and moving even faster than before, it has left Canadian territory and crossed into international waters probably just passing the 200-nautical-mile limit. That's from 9 km to about 60 km a year in just under 35 years!
My instruments and calculations suggest that the magnetic north pole is accelerating at an enormous rate, and in 2008 may have reached a velocity in excess of 100 km a year, my instruments also suggest it may have passed the geographic North Pole on its journey towards Siberia.
I further contacted Larry Newitt and asked his purpose in tracking the magnetic pole, his answer was so as to work out deviation for navigational purposes. At this point it seemed to me that no one has associated earth’s magnetic poles as being the axis of the magnetic field produced by earth’s inner iron core, which of course I am sure it must be. Or even that earth’s weaker magnetic poles are the axis of earth’s outer core, which again I'm sure they are
!
During my studies I noticed that the ice caps on the north and south poles were melting more on one side than the other and that this melting was on the same side of the geographic pole as the direction of movement of the magnetic poles. It was also clear to me that the north magnetic pole was moving faster than the south, and that the northern ice cap was melting faster than the southern.
This next graphic shows the south pole and the area that is melting fastest to the lower left hand corner plus the position of the south magnetic pole at that time.
This lower graphic shows the rough position of the north magnetic pole.
And this graphic shows the extent of melting in conjunction with the direction of travel of the north magnetic pole.
To me at this point alarm bells began to ring, as I could see there just had to be a connection between climate and magnetism within my findings. Soon after I could see a definite relationship between our magnetic pole movement and climate records, so at this point I moved my attention very much more to magnetism.
It is generally accepted within science that earth’s core is iron and that it creates earth’s own magnetic field. Recently a small group of scientists believe they found that earth’s core is made up of a large hexagonal crystalline structure, and that it is rotating faster than earth’s lithosphere. This is not difficult to believe as being a blacksmith I know that iron molecules have a very distinct hexagonal structure.
It has always been difficult for me to follow the general scientific consensus in believing that earth’s ocean currents were created by earth’s own wind patterns. My understanding of physics tells me that this could simply not be so because of the density differences, wind alone could not possibly move such large deep and heavy volumes of water!
A recent study showed that surface wind only affects a volume of water amounting to just three times the depth of a surface wave.
: In short something else must be driving our ocean currents and cloud formations. So now the question is what else could be doing so?
The answer I believe is diamagnetism.
Very few people have heard of diamagnetism and even fewer realize what it is. Diamagnetism has the opposite effect to magnetism in that objects or substances that are diamagnetic are repelled from both poles of a ferro magnet. Believe it or not water is diamagnetic.
My experiments show that water is very easily pushed along by a powerful magnetic field. the following video was shot from above. Watch this video.
My experiments also show that earth’s core, due to its magnetic field, has great effect on our ocean currents and even more on its saturated atmosphere and cloud formations.
Fig (5) shows an ocean eddy near the southern tip of South America. It is around 40 miles across and clearly shows its influence on the surrounding cloud formation.
Fig(5)
Could it be that because of the difference in speed of earth’s core and its outer layer that the above graphic shows, our ocean and atmosphere are at this point mimicking an iron rich magma vortex beneath our oceanic lithosphere?
After some years of study and experimentation it has become apparent to me that earth’s magnetic core has great effect on our climate patterns. It pushes along our ocean currents and saturated atmosphere.
Fig(6) 
In March 2006 this bizarre hexagon shape was discovered on Saturn’s North Pole by NASA’s Cassini mission, it is believed to be high speed wind racing around Saturn’s pole. NASA's Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft imaged the feature over two decades ago. It has puzzled scientists ever since.
Fig (2)
Earth too has high-speed winds racing around its poles; these are its jet streams, and studying northern jet stream archives I came across this lower graphic produced with data collected in 2005.
Fig(3) 
It would be very difficult for anyone to deny earth too has a hexagonal high speed wind racing around it northern pole and is very similar to Saturn’s.
Since that time earth’s jet streams have been breaking up more and more each year until now they are almost none existent.
Fig (4) 
David Dempsey from the State University of San Francisco was at the time of writing this paper the person responsible for collating the data used in producing the graphics for our Jet streams. Unfortunately he is unable to produce records earlier than Dec 2005, for the lack of computer storage space available to him! I am sure that if or when they have more space available the records will show definite examples of earth’s northern hexagon.
All the evidence I have studied indicates that magnetism directly creates earth’s jet streams along with its northern and southern ocean currents, but as far as I am able to determine this factor is not included in any of our climate models. Magnetic data appears to be collected from a very thin two-dimensional layer near earth’s surface. This data represents such a very tiny and insignificant layer of earth’s enormous magnetic field that it must be virtually useless to scientific research.
Recently I believe I have discovered earth’s core is rotating a little over 378 times per year compared to its surface rotation of 365 times, this I have been able to establish from NASA’s own data. What I am now suggesting is that our moon, because it rotates around earth 13.37 times a year, is magnetically fixed with earth’s inner core and that this is the reason why we only ever see one side of our moon!
Another thing I question is that the pull of the moon on our oceans causes our twice 25 hourly tidal pattern! It is a known fact that water is diamagnetic and that since 1905 when a lunar relationship was first associated with earth’s tidal system, no one seems to have mentioned the magnetic qualities of water. I believe it can only mean that earth’s core is pushing water up rather that the moon pulling on it as presently believed, or perhaps. As earth’s moon passes over any stretch of water it strengthens the attraction of earth’s magnetic core toward the moon, which in turn repels water away from earth’s core causing the rise of earth’s seas and consequently our tides.
This next chart Fig (7), is produced from data collected by scientists shows the rise in Carbon Dioxide and temperature over the past 150 years.
Fig (7)
Now I would like to add my own chart showing my findings on the velocity of earth’s north magnetic pole over the same period.
Fig(8)
This chart shows an undeniable process whose time scale relates exactly to present and past climate change data. I am certain this process is the cause of climate change, and unbelievably appears to have been largely overlooked by science.
My Conclusion
I suggest earth’s core has a distinct wobble. And that its distant historic path has been recorded within the 400,000 year ice core records recently collected by scientists, and that it’s more recent movement has been recorded within the historic path of earth’s north magnetic pole. Earth’s magnetic field has much more effect on earth’s own atmosphere and weather patterns than ever we could imagine.
I also suggest that earth’s Arctic and Antarctic ice caps are not simply melting, they are merely moving in conjunction with earth’s core and magnetic field.
And as earth’s magnetic field (indicated by recent movement of its magnetic poles) is moving in an unusual direction and velocity at this very moment, it is not surprising we are undergoing this present period of Climate Change.
A further thought is that earth may never have been under the influence of an ice age in the way we are presently taught. Instead because of the movement of our ice caps I believe it may have created an illusion by producing mini or local ice ages where ever they move, but on a much shorter time scale.
Copyright belongs to Roy Masters, Norfolk, UK.
Roy Masters. March 2009.
Contact Roy at: Geologymaster@aol.com.